Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cem Ilkel vs Zizou Bergs Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Bergs analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Zizou Bergs Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ilkel 2 - 0 Bergs
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 46.71% of points on their second serve, while Bergs has won 51.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 50.73% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bergs has won 50.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.25% and 32.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 51.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bergs has saved 60.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 39.22% of matches played (W/L 20/ 31), with Bergs winning 65.75% (W/L 48/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Bergs has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 70% (W/L 14/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 80/ 51).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Bergs has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ilkel winning 2 times and Bergs being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 4 and Bergs winning 1. The last match between Ilkel and Bergs was at the Bratislava Challenger, 08-11-2022, First, I.hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Bergs have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ilkel winning 1 times and Bergs 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Bergs 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 233.96 while Bergs has played against players with an average rank of 267.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bergs has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 39.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bergs has converted 40.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
407
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
81
Rank
81
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
56% (401-315)
Career Total W/L
63% (285-170)
36% (9-16)
YTD W/L
67% (28-14)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$471,835
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Cem Ilkel vs Zizou Bergs For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Ilkel VS Bergs
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Zizou Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 31 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 13 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:15 | 1:56:15 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (88/156) | 64% (108/169) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (63/88) | 57% (62/108) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (34/68) | 49% (30/61) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (12/28) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (77/169) | 38% (59/156) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Zizou Bergs
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
67 of
97)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Zizou Bergs
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Zizou Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (9/16) | 67% (28/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 36% (20/35) | 63% (67/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (219/281) | 53% (541/475) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (4/8) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 77% (17/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 64% (7/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.62 |
| Aces Total | 117 | 309 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 134 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:59 | 1:57:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 190.92 | 302.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (879/1532) | 62% (1930/3120) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (610/879) | 73% (1407/1930) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (305/653) | 52% (617/1190) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (38/97) | 40% (127/315) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (505/1447) | 39% (1264/3216) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) | 75% (12/4) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (8/24) | 69% (25/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 80% (12/15) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 54% (7/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | 79% (29/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | 21% (29/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 38% (13/5) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Zizou Bergs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Zizou Bergs
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Omar Jasika
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
82%
(
58 of
71)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Zizou Bergs
63%
(
85 of
136)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
128)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
36%
(
49 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
49 of
128)
136
Total Points Won
128
|
6-3 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Maximilian Marterer
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
111)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
22%
(
18 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
71%
(
100 of
141)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
125)
15
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
3
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
62 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
125)
140
Total Points Won
126
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mathias Bourgue
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Joris De Loore
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Chidekh
41%
(
17 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Zizou Bergs
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Juncheng Shang
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Ilkel Vs Bergs Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ilkel are available here and Bergs photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Zizou Bergs
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
